November 4, 2007 8:22 am
Firestarter
Posted by Will under recollections
With news of the 38,000-acre fire out in Santa Clarita having been started by a 10-year-old boy playing with matches my first impulse was a desire to see the kid and his parents and even the family dog prosecuted to the full extent of the law — and if the law wasn’t severe enough then enact one that is and make it retroactive and put ‘em all away and/or make restitution a monkey on their collective back for a loooooooong time.
Then I remembered back when I almost became that kid, albeit the only thing I almost burned down was a garage. And I was older by a year or two, but just as stupid. See back in that day living on Holly Drive near the base of the Hollywood Hills I was almost as much into building model planes as I was into eventually destroying them. I’d buy those Revell kits from the Hollywood Toy Store bring ‘em back home and attempt to construct them as meticulously as they appeared on the boxtops. And when I’d inevitably fail to replicate such perfection I might display them for a while or hang them in a mock dogfight from the ceiling in my room, but ultimately they were destined to crash and burn in one big beautiful ball of flame.
When I’d done it in the past it had been out in the open — maybe an alleyway or a vacant lot. I’d trundle the planes outside with me and one of my mom’s lighters, set a wing or tail on fire and toss them across the sky in a wonderous smoking/flaming arc to their point of impact with the planet where they’d melt and smolder (and one time I learned the painful lesson not to stamp out burning plastic with bare feet).
But on this occasion and for a failure of logic and common sense I can only ascribe to being a dumbass kid, the location for my conflagration was going to be behind the apartment building I lived in and inside the multi-car garage — stucco on the outside but all aged open wood framing and beams on the inside.
I did have some glimmer of understanding that the resulting pire of whatever miniature legendary WWII aircraft being destroyed would be small enough not to negatively impact the structure, and sure enough after it caught a flame and made its final voyage to its crashing place on the concrete floor of the garage, it produced more fizzling smoke than fire. And that’s where the real stupidity set in. Because all of a sudden I wanted there to be a lot of fire, and dang if the nearby stack of old newspapers wouldn’t do that trick.
Now at this point if this were a “Davey & Goliath” episode, Goliath would either show up and say “WTF Davey!” or Davey himself would contemplate what Jesus might do or generally there’d be some sort of “hand of god” device that would give Davey a clue and avert disaster. But this wasn’t TV, this was just some bored afterschool latchkey idiot pre-teen with what he needed at his disposal to unwittingly burn a muzzafuzzin’ garage down.
Luckily and thankfully the fantastically mesmerizing six-foot leaping flames I fueled by feeding the fire copious crumpled pages of the L.A. Times, came up a foot or so short of being able to lick the roofbeams, and no lingering embers alighted long enough along the exposed studs or leaked-oil patches to ignite, and thus I did not burn down anything and potentially rechart the rest of my childhood by having to do a stretch in juvenile hall as a blooming firebug. Incorrigible punk? Yes. Arsonist? Please.
In my weakass defense, with the flames dancing a couple feet above my four-foot-something head and the resulting smoke getting pretty dense, there was something inside that broke through all that rampant stupidity and said “OK, that’s enough now. Stop. No, really. STOP building a fire inside a building.” And so I did and the flames died down until I tamped them out as the smoke cleared until there was nothing left but a solidifying puddle of plastic on the concrete that had once been a hastily crafted and poorly detailed P-51 Mustang or a German Folke Wulf or a Japanese Zero.
Back into the apartment I went with no one the wiser and instead of my young life taking a horrible and regrettable detour, instead I probably watched reruns of “Wild Wild West” and “The Mickey Mouse Club” until my mom got home from work later that afternoon and made dinner and then later I went to bed and the next day I went to school and life went on. To my credit, that was the last model airplane I ever destroyed.
My belabored point: I’m not at all trying to excuse the kid responsible for causing such a vast swath of destruction across Santa Clarita, I’m just trying to keep it in perspective. Us young ones don’t mean harm most of the time. What we do are senseless things with radar that isn’t yet developed enough to identify care or concern for the consequences. For every major brushfire that burns out of control there are thousands of garages that don’t. I’m trying to remember that instead of wanting this boy’s head on a platter.


November 4th, 2007 at 1:27 pm
Will, I am with you. The destruction was awful, but I have to give the kid credit. He came forward and admitted fooling around. The last I heard the County wasn’t going to prosecute as there was no malice, just stupid kid tricks which, as you so accurately pointed out, we all did.
I had the added bonus growing up, fireworks were legal. My friends and I spent all winter building various planes and ships only to load with fireworks, TP and lighter fluid (to ensure maximum flameage)and proceded to stage very lively battles. The end result was a lot of melted plastic. Never did we burn down the corn field behing my house. Though there was a fire of mysterious origin one year when it was fallow for grazing.
November 4th, 2007 at 9:56 pm
Its a very very sticky situation, there are a lot of what if’s involved. Would you be willing to let this child and/or his family off as easily had many families been burnt out of their homes or if someone had been hurt or killed? Where does the age line blur where we do prosecute? 12? 14? I certainly don’t have the answers, but this is one of the reasons why the our legal system imbues our prosecutors with something referred to as prosecutorial discretion. It allows the prosecutor in charge of the case (or more often the highest ranking prosecutor in charge of the prosecutor who has been handed the case) the right to determine whether he or she will prosecute the case regardless of the facts. The discretionary decision is often made for political reasons one way or another, but occassionaly it is made out of compassion. If this child is not prosecuted, then my guess is that it was a compassionate decision as someone will probably pay the political price for not charging the child. On the other hand, I rather imagine that the children’s parents may well face some very heavy civil litigation from both the governments (city, county and state) along with actions by any private individuals who were hurt in some manner. I doubt the kid and his parents will get off scott-free.
November 5th, 2007 at 7:41 pm
Mark, interesting observations. The news report I saw said no prosecution pending for lack of malice.
The boy lived with his parents in a trailer. One of the parents was a caretaker, ranch hand. I doubt there is any funds to be had or attach. I doubt as well there will be insurance money to be had. The county and others may well attempt to collect but best guess is when no money is found they will close the books as unrecoverable.
If there was malice and other factors I would agree prosection is in order. What I saw so far indicates a stupid kid trick with a kid quickly owning up to and admitting his errors. I think a little compassion can fit into the equation.
Intentional is another issue and toss the book at ‘em. I just haven’t heard that was a factor here.
November 5th, 2007 at 7:41 pm
PS…the age of reason is 12, at that point you can be held accountable for your actions. That comes from 15 years of litigation experience in the civil realm.