Sun 24 Jul 2011
And AAA Responds
Posted by Will under biking, letters, politics
[10] Comments
On July 14, in response to a post on BikinginLA to contact the Auto Club about its opposition to Senate Bill 910, (which would make it law for motorists to allow at least three feet when passing bicyclists), I wrote to the heads of the Northern and Southern California chapters, the letters of which you can read here.
In the mail yesterday came the following two-page reply from Stephen Finnegan, AAA’s manager of Governement Affairs and Public Policy (both images can be enlarged to readability if clicked):
In a nutshell it’s a restatement of what I knew already to be AAA’s position, with some insight offered into the organization’s initial interest in getting “clarifying amendments” added to the original bill. When those amendments were not included an “oppose unless amended” was the stance taken.
Finnegan also included some companion materials to reinforce a point he made about the Auto Club’s commitment to multi-modality. Unbeknownst to him those pieces did more damage than endearment as they were a slanted feature in Westways magazine that I took letter-writing issue with after reading it last year, and a booklet AAA published, whose first words disagreeably read by this previous 30-mile roundtrip bike commuter are “Bicycling is a great option for shorter trips…” and whose last page features the following image of a road sign showing an aggressive sportscar “sharing” the road by passing the cyclist with decidedly less than three feet between them:
Just as Finnegan wrote that AAA supports the intent of SB 910 but doesn’t think it will be effective in achieving this objective, so do I support the intent of his cordial and informative and timely response, which was ultimately as ineffective.
10 Responses to “ And AAA Responds ”
Trackbacks & Pingbacks:
-
[...] AAA responds to Will Campbell’s complaint about opposing California’s proposed three-foot passing law; not surprisingly, they don’t [...]
-
[...] AAA Responds to Heat from Not Supporting 3-Foot-Passing Law ([SIC]) [...]
-
[...] AAA Responds to Heat from Not Supporting 3-Foot-Passing Law ([SIC]) [...]
-
[...] California AAA explains to Will Campbell why it could not support a 3-foot passing law for bicycles: When our amendments were not included, [...]
-
[...] are powerful forces that oppose this commonsense legislation to make our streets safer for California cyclists. And it will take all of us joined together in [...]




we went away for an overnight trip. hit a bunch of back roads to avoid the vacationing crowds. I saw a bunch of bikes, saw a bunch of vehicles. I’d have to say over 1/2 the vehicles had NO IDEA how much room they needed to safely pass a bike. Mind you, there were a few bike idiots—3 across down a 2 lane road, no mirrors and not looking around. But on the whole pretty ok riders. Yet, more than 1/2 the vehicles wobbled out over the center line to “pass” the bikes, or tried to squeeze between the centre line and the bikes while an opposing vehicle was oncoming. I don’t know that a law is going to help one way or the other, but opposing something that can potentially make the streets safer for ALL travelers on the road, seems to be a good idea. Too bad AAA doesn’t think so. My family has been a member of AAA for 93 years…too bad they aren’t looking out for me too, unless of course, I’m in a vehicle insured by them. argh
The AAA is getting way too callous about the safety of bike riders versus the convenience of drivers. I do both – drive and ride – around the Palos Verdes Peninsula, and would like to see a 3 foot limit to give a “bright line” safety margin for cyclists. If that means slow down a while in my car, fine. The beauty of a bright line rule is my neighbor in the car behind me, when I am in my car, can see and understand why I cannot use “geometry” or “on coming traffic” issues to justify passing with 1 foot of clearance. Why it should ever be necessary to give over 3 feet of clearance is not apparent or or explained. We love AAA in general, but on this issue, the AAA is out to lunch.
=v= Most StR signs are worthless, but that’s got to be the worst one ever. Yeesh!
sign—wait, how many Ferrari’s do YOU know that WILLINGLY share the road?!?!?!
in NorCal there’s a movement to give more room to bikes.
http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_18561104
While I agree some of the original planning wasn’t so bike friendly, the concern I see is that they are removing 2 lanes of traffic in most cases (1 each way)–and already pissed off, road raged folks are going to do some things like try to use the 6ft bike lane to pass vehicles who are going too slow. At some point, it is going to be really dangerous and we all know who “wins” in that situation.
not sure I know the answer, but with more congestion and more road rage, making traffic worse doesn’t seem to be the answer (ask South Pas about their new bulb-outs!)